|
发表于 2012-3-10 15:46:23
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 <i>serious</i> 于 2012-3-9 17:21 发表 <a href="http://bbs.hasea.com/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=6859888&ptid=447008" target="_blank"><img src="http://bbs.hasea.com/images/common/back.gif" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt='Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor='hand'; this.alt='Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(this.src);}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" /></a><br />
<img src="images/smilies/sweat.gif" smilieid="10" border="0" alt="" /> <br />
很明显,当初380降300,直接的效果也是目的就是不让全程点到点的时间能和飞机相当。那之后拿出的“安全说”“能耗说”“成本说”全是粉饰"利益说"的本质的。 <br />
证据不足,380风险太大,舒适度可能也难以满足旅客的需要。 |
|